Home  •  How the Transmission System Works  •  Webcast  •  Studies & Reports  •  Projects  •  Contact Us 
Planning Zones

Northwest Zone
Northeast Zone
West Central Zone
Twin Cities Zone
Southwest Zone
Southeast Zone

MN Counties (large map)

Sponsoring Utilities
American Transmission Company
Central Minnesota Power Agency/Services
Dairyland Power Cooperative
East River Electric Power Cooperative
Great River Energy
ITC Midwest
L&O Power Cooperative
Minnesota Power
Minnkota Power Cooperative
Missouri River Energy
Otter Tail Power Company
Rochester Public Utilities Commission
Southern Minnesota
Municipal Power Agency
Xcel Energy
Participating Government Agencies
Minnesota Public Utililities Commission
Minnesota Department of Commerce
Environmental Quality Board
Related Links
North American Electric Reliability Council
Midcontinent ISO
National Electric Safety Code
US Department of Energy
CapX2020.com

Studies and Reports > 2009 MN Biennial Report > NE Planning Zone > Needs: 6.3.18 Bigfork Area

To inquire about this project, click here.


Transmission Projects Report 2009
Section 6.3: Northeast Zone
 
p. 121

6.3.18 Bigfork Area

Tracking Number: 2009-NE-N5

Utility: Great River Energy

Inadequacy: The 69 kV system serving North Itasca Electric Cooperative’s service territory is a 60-mile radial line, and recent load growth has pushed the load serving capability of the system to its limits. A single contingency that removes the 115 kV source at Deer River causes marginal voltages to occur on several of the area substations during peak system loading.

A map of the area is shown on the following page.

Alternatives. Alternatives include distributed generation or a new transmission source tapping the Little Fork-Shannon 230 kV line to loop in the 69 kV transmission system. Any transmission solution would require, at minimum, a new transmission substation and at least 20 miles of 69 kV transmission.

Analysis. A distributed generation investment would have to be continual or sized to accommodate the future load growth. A transmission solution is attractive as it would offer a redundant source to the North Itasca system (increasing electric service reliability to the area) and allow for rebuilding of the existing aging transmission infrastructure. A new transmission source would also provide a backup for loss of the Deer River transformer, which is a rather severe contingency as backup sources are many miles away.

Schedule. GRE is targeting an in-service date between 2013 and 2015 for any investment in this area. Right-of-way activities for a transmission solution could commence as early as 2010.

 


Transmission Projects Report 2009
Section 6.3: Northeast Zone
 
p. 122

Click here or on map below to download high resolution PDF map.